Drawing for THE FLAME OF LIBERTY

USPTO serial 75178794

THE FLAME OF LIBERTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FLAME OF LIBERTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL D HOBBS JR

MICHAEL D HOBBS JR DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHER, LLP100 SPEAR ST M STE 1500SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016address books; albums for photographs; appointment books; graphic or printed art reproductions; ball-point pens; banners made of paper; bookends; bookmarks; recipe books; notebooks; reference books related to art, sculpture and/or the history of United States immigrants; paper bows for gift wrap; bumper stickers; calendar desk pads; calendars; greeting cards; note cards; note paper; coasters made of paper; coin albums; color prints; coloring books; cook books; crayons; daily planners; decals; desk top organizers; diaries; paper flags; gift cards; gift wrapping paper; letter openers; lithographs; magazines related to art, sculpture and or immigrants to the United States; markers; paper napkins; paintings; paper weights; pen and pencil trays; pen cases; pen or pencil holders; pencil boxes; pencil sharpeners; pencils; paper pennants; pens; postcards; posters; rubber stamps; paper tableclothsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 27, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 19, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 27, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 3, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 8, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 23, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance