USPTO serial 75179359
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SWISS CHALET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by SWISS CHALET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
SWISS CHALET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by SWISS CHALET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOLORES MORO-GROSSMAN
DOLORES MORO-GROSSMAN FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ 38TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepared foods, namely, chicken dishes; vegetable and/or cheese dishes; soups; salads, namely, mixed green salads; Greek salads, Caesar salads, and tuna salads; milk, yogurt and fruit based smoothies, yogurt; milk and flavored milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | chicken and/or vegetable pies, pasta dishes; pasta salads; bread salad; hot and cold sandwiches; bakery goods, namely, danish, muffins, muffin tops, buns, scones, bagels, biscuits, and cookies; granola; beverages, namely, coffee, flavored coffee, ice coffee, tea, iced tea, hot chocolate, white hot chocolate, chocolate and coffee mixes; frozen yogurt; baked desserts, namely, cakes, pies, pastries, brownies and fruit cobblers; ice cream; sorbet, coffee beans | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | beverages, namely, non-alcoholic carbonated soft drinks, sweet cider, non carbonated fruit juices and fruit drinks, flavored and unflavored mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 15, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |