USPTO serial 75179467
RALPH LAUREN PURPLE LABEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RALPH LAUREN PURPLE LABEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
RICKY LAUREN and MARK N. KAPLAN, both U.S. citizens, as trustees of THE RALPH LAUREN TRUST
New York, NY
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA M GIGLIOTTI
LISA M GIGLIOTTI COSMAIR INC575 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume, eau de cologne, eau de toilette, and after shave lotion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRL USA HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RICKY LAUREN and MARK N. KAPLAN, both U.S. citizens, as trustees of THE RALPH LAUREN TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by PRL USA HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named RALPH LAUREN PURPLE LABEL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |