USPTO serial 75179473
MEDERMA APPEAREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDERMA APPEAREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. PATRICK SAGE
G PATRICK SAGE500 COLUMBIA PLZ350 E MICHIGAN AVEKALAMAZOO, MI 49007-3856Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetic and cleaning preparations, namely, a gel, cream, or ointment designed to improve the appearance of scars, blemishes, and other skin imperfections | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | pharmaceuticals, namely, a gel, cream, or ointment designed to improve the appearance of scars, blemishes, and other topical imperfections | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERZ, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by MERZ, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MEDERMA APPEAREX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |