USPTO serial 75179561
GATEWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2441198Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2001
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GATEWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARTH E JANKE
GARTH E JANKE BIRDWELL JANKE & DURANDO PLC900 SW 5TH AVE STE 1925PORTLAND, OR 97204-1235UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for use with a medical instrument for interconnecting to an electronic medical records system | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2003 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |