USPTO serial 75180113
VIPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INFOGRAMES UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED
CASTLEFIELD MANCHESTER, GB
Castlefield, Manchester M3 4LZ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH T NABOR
JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY16TH FL 120 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-3406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer game programs and carrying cases for computer game programs, but not any computer game programs relating to reptiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | WRDA | WITHDRAWAL OF REFUSAL DURING APPEAL | — |
| Aug 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |