USPTO serial 75180309
MOVING LIGHT THROUGH TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOVING LIGHT THROUGH TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEINZ D GRETHER
HEINZ D GRETHER HIGH END SYSTEMS INC2217 W BRAKER LNAUSTIN, TX 78758UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical fluid for use with machines for producing faux smoke/fog for entertainment lighting, theatrical lighting, fire safety training and industrial testing | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | machines for generating faux smoke/fog for entertainment lighting, theatrical lighting, fire safety training, and industrial testing | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | controllers for remotely controlling automated lighting fixtures used for entertainment and architectural applications | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | automated lighting systems and equipment for entertainment and architectural applications consisting of automated lighting fixtures, controllers for remotely controlling the automated lighting fixtures, and outdoor weather-resistant housing for the lighting fixtures, all sold as a unit; automated lighting fixtures for entertainment and architectural applications; outdoor weather resistant housings for automated lighting fixtures for entertainment and architectural applications; automated lighting fixtures for entertainment and architectural applications and controllers for remotely controlling the lighting fixtures, all sold as a unit; and gobos and dichroic light filters for use in the automated lighting fixtures for entertainment and architectural applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by High End Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by High End Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named MOVING LIGHT THROUGH TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |