Drawing for DISC PAK 2000

USPTO serial 75180715

DISC PAK 2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUN, JEAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISC PAK 2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LILE H DEINARD

LILE H DEINARD GREENBERG TRAURIG HOFFMAN LIPOFF ET ALCITICORP CTR153 E 53RD STNEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016pressboard packaging for use by manufacturers and distributors of compact discsACTIVE—
035packaging compact discs for manufacturers and distributors thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 1999ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance