Drawing for STERLING CLUB

USPTO serial 75181052

STERLING CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STERLING CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID M KLEIN

DAVID M KLEIN BRYAN CAVE LLP245 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10167UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Services provided only to frequent guests of the Hanford Hotel chain, namely, hotel services of a preferred customer program that offers preferential room rates, upgraded rooms, newspaper delivery and prizes earned from points accumulated after several stays in a Hanford HotelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 14, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 1, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 15, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance