USPTO serial 75181052
STERLING CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STERLING CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M KLEIN
DAVID M KLEIN BRYAN CAVE LLP245 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10167UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Services provided only to frequent guests of the Hanford Hotel chain, namely, hotel services of a preferred customer program that offers preferential room rates, upgraded rooms, newspaper delivery and prizes earned from points accumulated after several stays in a Hanford Hotel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |