USPTO serial 75181244
STYLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2635547Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STYLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newtown Square, PA
Newtown Square, PA
D-51368 LEVERKUSEN-BAYERWERK, DE
D-51368 LEVERKUSEN-BAYERWERK, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY C. MACEL, III
STANLEY C MACEL III CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, namely, polyols for use in the manufacture of polyurethane foam | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 24, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCO Chemical Company
- Other trademarks owned by ARCO Chemical Company
- Other trademarks owned by BAYER AKTIENGESELSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by BAYER AKTIENGESELSCHAFT
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named STYLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |