Drawing for SATELLITE

USPTO serial 75181542

SATELLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATELLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WAYNE A SIVERTSON

WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI ROONEY & SIVERTSON PABROADWAY PL E STE 4013433 BROADWAY ST NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010catheters for neurological applicationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 6, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 10, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 20, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 30, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance