USPTO serial 75181759
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH W MEDANSKY
KEITH W MEDANSKY RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |