USPTO serial 75181852
HOT FUDGE FANTASY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOT FUDGE FANTASY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Essential Box Company Limited, The
Forest Hill, London, SE23 3HN, GB
Other trademarks owned by Essential Box Company Limited, The
Essential Box Company Limited, The
Forest Hill, London, SE23 3HN, GB
Other trademarks owned by Essential Box Company Limited, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE R PETTIT
GEORGE R PETTIT POLLOCK VANDE SANDE & PRIDDYP O BOX 19088WASHINGTON, DC 20036-0088UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | confectionery, namely, sugar confectionery, namely, biscuits, cakes, candies, chocolates, chocolate confectionery, namely, chocolate products and chocolate spread | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Essential Box Company Limited, The
- Other trademarks owned by Essential Box Company Limited, The
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named HOT FUDGE FANTASY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |