USPTO serial 75181867
KISSING CHOCOLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KISSING CHOCOLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Essential Box Company Limited, The
Forest Hill, LONDON, SE23 3HN, GB
Other trademarks owned by Essential Box Company Limited, The
Essential Box Company Limited, The
Forest Hill, LONDON, SE23 3HN, GB
Other trademarks owned by Essential Box Company Limited, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE R PETTIT
GEORGE R PETTIT POLLOCK, VANDE, SANDE & PRIDDYP O BOX 19088WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | chocolate products, namely, chocolate spread, chocolate paste, chocolate sauce, hazelnut chocolate spread, flavored chocolate spread, caramel flavored chocolate spread | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |