USPTO serial 75182007
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Novak
Linda M. Novak Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | repair and maintenance of computers, electronic equipment and information communications systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |