USPTO serial 75182204
COAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M WIRTZ
RICHARD M WIRTZ SAN DIEGO OFFICE2210 ENCINITAS BLVD STE SENCINITAS, CA 92024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services, sports bar services, nightclub services, wholesale distribution of restaurant food and supplies, namely, cups, napkins, bags, T-shirts, aprans, caps, invoices, stationery, business cards, checks, retail sales of shirts, caps, and licensing of trademark and trademark | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |