USPTO serial 75182245
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Redwood City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARC M GORELNIK
MARC M GORELNIK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing, by means of a global computer network or through on-line services, computer software games; educational services, namely, conducting elementary and secondary instruction in the field of math, science, literature, geography or health | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |