USPTO serial 75182454
DELL COMM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELL COMM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Brighton, MN
New Brighton, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK S FARRELL JR
CAROLYN M SANDBERG LINDQUIST & VENNUM PLLP4200 IDS CTR 80 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephone and telecommunication equipment, namely, telephone answering machines, telephone intercoms, telephone dialers, caller identification boxes, private branch exchange switches, telephones, cellular telephones, digital telephones, and radio telephones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |