USPTO serial 75182969
STOCKTREK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STOCKTREK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTINA L JOHNSON
45 FRANKLIN ST STE 204SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | on-line investment services provided by means of a global computer network, stock option borkerage services, financial analyses and consultation in the nature of asset allocation, and financial portfolio management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |