USPTO serial 75183039
CLOVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLOVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Surbiton, Surrey KT6 5Q1, GB
Surbiton, Surrey KT6 5Q1, GB
Surbiton, Surrey KT6 5Q1, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W LEEDS
HENRY W LEEDS VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | sandwich spreads; edible oils and edible fats, namely, spreads obtained from vegetable and animal fats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2001 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |