USPTO serial 75183277
CANIKUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANIKUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
6507 Ingelheim am Rhein, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
6507 Ingelheim am Rhein, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN J BERAN
MARTIN J BERAN SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLPSTE 2200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named CANIKUR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |