USPTO serial 75183587
MILLENNIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURINI, GEOFFREY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILLENNIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H WILLIAM LARSON
H WILLIAM LARSON HERBERT W LARSON PA7381 114TH AVE N STE 406LARGO, FL 33773UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer, ale, non-alcoholic malt beverages, non-alcoholic cocktail mixers, soft drinks; fruit juice concentrates, syrups, or powders used in the preparation thereof; fruit drinks, mineral water, carbonated water | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | prepared alcoholic cocktails, distilled spirits, wine coolers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |