USPTO serial 75183875
A MEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A MEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLEN J BADEN
ALLEN J BADEN KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume, toilet waters, perfume waters, eau de cologne, perfume extracts, essential oils for personal use, lipstick, facial cleanser, facial powder, body powder, perfumed talcum powder, eyeshadow, eye liner, cosmetic cover up powder and lotion, blush, mascara, sun tanning preparations, sun tan lotion, sun tan oil, sun tan gel, skin moisturizing lotion, bath gels, bath beads, bath crystals, bath oils, bath pearls, bath lotion, shampoo, hair conditioner, and non-medicated bath salts, soaps and deodorants for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |