USPTO serial 75183984
NUTRASWEET 2 BRAND SWEETENER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRASWEET 2 BRAND SWEETENER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Hoster
JEFFREY M HOSTER C/O THE NUTRASWEET COMPANY10 S WACKER DR STE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | low calorie artificial sweeteners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |