USPTO serial 75184453
Serial No. 75184453
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75184453?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
08755 Castellbisbal, Barcelona, ES
08755 Castellbisbal, Barcelona, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIA A SAVIO
MARIA S SAVIO GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | potato products with or without flavor modifiers, namely, potato crisps, potato-based snack foods and potato chips; french fried potatoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | potato products with or without flavored modifiers, namely, potato flour, rice-based, corn-based and ceral-based breakfast cereals--sweetened with sugar, honey, treacle syrup, jam, chocolate or any substance modifying the flavor; and corn-based and rice-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |