USPTO serial 75184463
NEW CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEW CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E APOLZON
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | import-export agencies; advertising agencies; management of sports facilities for others; shop window dressing; advertisement/bill posting for others; distributorships and retail outlets featuring food, non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages, perfumeries, cosmetics, soaps, detergents, kitchen utensils, general merchandise, paper and products thereof, stationeries, bags, furnitures, bedclothing, footwear, umbrellas, office machines and apparatus, toys, playthings, sporting goods, recreation goods, jewels, precious metals and imitations thereof and clothing; and the management of department stores for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing sports facilities, namely, health clubs and swimming pools; rental of sports equipments (except for sports vehicles); providing recreational facilities; and providing training in gymnastics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | hotel services; making hotel reservations for others; restaurant services; making restaurant reservations for others; cafeteria services; and catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |