USPTO serial 75184786
ORIGINAL ENGINE MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORIGINAL ENGINE MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLEN M KRASS
ALLEN M KRASS GIFFORD KRASS GROH SPRINKLE ET AL280 N WOODWARD STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | mail order catalog services featuring automobile parts, namely engine control components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |