USPTO serial 75184798
Z
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Z?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Torrence, CA
Torrence, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS W BEECH
19900 BEACH BLVD STE C-2HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear and men's clothing, namely, pants, shirts, jackets, belts, socks, and hats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |