USPTO serial 75185546
PIXL-PUZL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIXL-PUZL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COLLEEN C BUTLER
COLLEEN C BUTLER BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in generating and manipulating interactive computerized puzzles; CD-ROMs containing computer software for use in generating and manipulating interactive computerized puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed matter, namely, books about puzzles containing puzzles cutouts, postcards, greeting cards, and note cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | toys, namely, jigsaw puzzles, cube puzzles, and manipulative puzzles; educational toys, namely, art kits comprising puzzles and puzzles parts and teaching materials in the form of games and puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PIXEL PRODUCTS UNLIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by PIXEL PRODUCTS UNLIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PIXL-PUZL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |