Drawing for WATERLOO BOY

USPTO serial 75185579

WATERLOO BOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATERLOO BOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID C BRUENING

DAVID C BRUENING WEBB ZIESENHEIM BRUENING ET AL700 KOPPERS BLDG436 7TH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cologne and perfumeACTIVE—
008pocket knivesACTIVE—
014belt buckles of precious metal, jewelry, pins and watchesACTIVE—
016children's books, pens, pencils and stationeryACTIVE—
020plastic novelty license plates and plaquesACTIVE—
025wearing apparel, namely, belts, cowboy boots, work boots, caps, gloves, hats, jackets, jeans, pants, scarves, shirts, childrens' shoes, shorts, socks, swimsuits and vestsACTIVE—
026belt buckles not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 15, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 2, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 22, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 29, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 19, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 5, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 7, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance