USPTO serial 75185726
CYBER+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBER+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE & WYNNE, LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for use in the storage, retrieval, and transmission of medical records and related information over a global computer network and decision support software for hospital administration | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1996 |
| 039 | electronic storage of medical records and related information | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CYBERPLUS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TransWeb, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CYBERPLUS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named CYBER+
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |