USPTO serial 75185787
REAL-TIME PAGE MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REAL-TIME PAGE MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEEDHAM J BODDIE
BELL SELTZER PARK & GIBSON PAPOST OFFICE DRAWER 34009CHARLOTTE, NC 28234Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for creating and editing web pages, and material posted on web pages, on global computer networks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |