Drawing for SIERRA ENGINEERING

USPTO serial 75185834

SIERRA ENGINEERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIERRA ENGINEERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DOROTHY HARRIS

DOROTHY HARRIS LOCKE PURNELL RAIN HARRELL2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040on-site petroleum engineering services to implement the treatment and stimulation of oil and gas wells to enhance production, including the design and the on-site supervision and implementation of fracturing procedures by hydraulic fracturing and well casing perforating procedures by gun perforatingACTIVEJan 1, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 9, 2000EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Jan 10, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 10, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 13, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance