USPTO serial 75185835
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM D. JACKSON
WILLIAM D JACKSON LOCKE PURNELL RAIN HARRELL2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | on-site petroleum engineering services involving the drilling and completion of oil and gas wells including the on-site supervision and implementation of drilling operations, including selection of drilling parameters and drilling fluid and drilling fluid additives, the insertion of tubular goods, namely, casing and tubing strings into wells, and completion of wells | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |