USPTO serial 75185908
AMBIENTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMBIENTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stuttgart, DE
MERCEDES-BENZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
70327 Stuttgart, DE
Daimiler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft
70546 Stuttgart, DE
Daimiler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft
70546 Stuttgart, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V T GIORDANO
V T GIORDANO VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN ET AL60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automobiles and structural parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Daimlerchrysler Ag
- Other trademarks owned by MERCEDES-BENZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by Daimiler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Daimiler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named AMBIENTE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |