USPTO serial 75187037
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rancho Cordova, CA
Rancho Cordova, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROCHELLE D ALPERT
ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer peripherals; electronic transmitters and receivers; wireless communication networks; computer firmware; computer operating software; and computer software; all for allowing multiple home users to simultaneously access application software from a single computer without the use of wires, and instructional manuals sold as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1998 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |