USPTO serial 75187119
WEB-LOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEB-LOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY A ANDREWS
JEFFREY A ANDREWS VERNON VERNON WOOTEN BROWN ANDREWS ET ALP O BOX 2958BURLINGTON, NC 27216-2958UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | elastic fabric containing both a horizontal and vertical lock stitch to prevent runs or unraveling in either direction sold as an integral component of orthopedic back support products | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |