USPTO serial 75189175
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Computer Graphics Systems Development Corporation
Mountain View, CA
Other trademarks owned by Computer Graphics Systems Development Corporation
Computer Graphics Systems Development Corporation
Mountain View, CA
Other trademarks owned by Computer Graphics Systems Development Corporation
Computer Graphics Systems Development Corporation
Mountain View, CA
Other trademarks owned by Computer Graphics Systems Development Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS M CLARKSON
DOUGLAS M CLARKSON Hinman, Howard & Kattell80 Exchange StreetP.O. Box 5250Binghamton, NY 13901| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for generating realistic texture patterns for visual simulation and virtual reality systems and computer software, namely, a data library of realistic texture patterns for visual simulation and virtual reality systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 7, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |