USPTO serial 75190062
PROTOCOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTOCOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN A CAHILL
KEVIN A CAHILL SULLIVAN WERTZ MCDADE & WALLACE945 FOURTH AVESAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic apparatus and computer software for managing and controlling communications across multiple platforms, namely, communications servers and communications processor cards that support numerous general purpose and specialty data communications protocols and software that operates and supports such servers and cards; communications protocol software downloadable from global computer networks, intra-company networks, online electronic communications networks and/or other computer networks or series of interconnecting or interlinking computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | maintenance and repair of communications equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | updating and support of communications software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |