USPTO serial 75190480
EUREKALERT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EUREKALERT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOY KAPLAN WILDES
JOY KAPLAN WILDES ROGERS & WELLSTWO HUNDRED PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing scientific, mathematical and technological information for use by the media and journalists through links to science visuals and reference works via a global computer network; and providing a web site for use by the media and journalists featuring news and research in the fields of science, medicine, math, technology, and social sciences via a global computer network | ACTIVE | May 20, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |