USPTO serial 75190497
REEL REVIEWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REEL REVIEWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Bush
DOUGLAS R BUSH ARENT FOX PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD-ROMs featuring movie review information | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | books in the field of movie review information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telephonic transmission of data for collecting and informing others of movie review information through use of personal computers employing computer communication information networks and interactive telephone pre-recorded messages | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing movie review information by means of interactive telephone pre-recorded messages and a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MovieFone, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MovieFone, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA ONLINE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named REEL REVIEWS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |