USPTO serial 75191034
LONE WOLF AND CUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LONE WOLF AND CUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilmington, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAIWEN TSENG
KAIWEN TSENG CARLTON FIELDS WARD EMMANUEL SMITH ET ALPOST OFFICE BOX 3239TAMPA, FL 33601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | foreign motion picture films, either dubbed or with subtitles featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation; foreign motion picture films either dubbed or with subtitles for broadcast on television featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation; video tapes, video cassettes, video discs all containing foreign films either dubbed or with subtitles and featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |