USPTO serial 75191122
RAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FREDERICK W NIEBUHR
FREDERICK W NIEBUHR LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN1500 NORWEST FINANCIAL CTR7900 XERXES AVE SBLOOMINGTON, MN 55431-1194Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | computer hardware, namely, disk drives and electronics interconnecting the disk drives, and computer software programs, configured as mass data storage systems designed to provide improved data availability and improved performance, and interfaces between such systems and other data processing components | ACTIVE | Nov 13, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |