USPTO serial 75191695
PAGAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAGAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERICH W MERRILL JR
ERICH W MERRILL JR MILLER, NASH, WIENER, HAGER & CARLSEN3500 US BANCORP TWR 111 SW FIFTH AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204-3699Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | pasta, ready-cooked sauces for use on pasta, ready-cooked pastas with sauces, processed semolina, wheat flour, and bread crumbs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |