USPTO serial 75192430
DICOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DICOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK J COYNE
PATRICK J COYNE COLLIER SHANNON RILL & SCOTT PLLC3050 K ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | developing industry standards, through managing and conducting the consensus approval process of the accredited standards committee for voluntary, national, consensus standards relating to digital imaging and communications in medicine that the proposed standard has achieved consensus by ballot of the published consensus body; testing for consensus achievement; managing comments received; and resolution of the comments so that consensus can be achieved, pursuant to guidelines developed by the accredited standards committee and published by the sponsor or at the direction of the secretariat of the American National Standards Institute or the accredited standards committee | ACTIVE | Mar 23, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |