USPTO serial 75193993
SHOWPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, TERESA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOWPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BERKSHIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
LENOX, MA
Other trademarks owned by BERKSHIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
BERKSHIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
LENOX, MA
Other trademarks owned by BERKSHIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Berkshire Computer Processing Center, Inc.
Lenox, MA
Other trademarks owned by Berkshire Computer Processing Center, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW N. FREDBECK
ANDREW N FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing information regarding trade shows, exhibitors at trade shows and individuals attending trade shows in a wide variety of fields via a global computer network; data processing and providing sales lead information related to, or obtained in connection with, trade shows via a global computer network; services related to arranging and conducting trade show exhibitions in a wide variety of fields, namely, trade show registration services and providing global computer network links to hotel and travel reservation information and services, all via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BERKSHIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BERKSHIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Berkshire Computer Processing Center, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SHOWPLUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |