USPTO serial 75194692
KRONOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KRONOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AVENTIS PHARMA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
D-65926 FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
Frankfurt am Main, DE
Frankfurt am Main, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID EHRLICH
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparation for cerebrovascular and neuroprotective therapy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AVENTIS PHARMA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named KRONOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |