USPTO serial 75195295
FUTURE MOLDING GAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUTURE MOLDING GAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W SECREST
P O BOX 1303CHEHALIS, WA 98532UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed survey answer sheets | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |