Drawing for FUTURE MOLDING GAME

USPTO serial 75195295

FUTURE MOLDING GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEEGARS, GERALD C.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUTURE MOLDING GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS W SECREST

P O BOX 1303CHEHALIS, WA 98532UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed survey answer sheetsACTIVEOct 11, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 28, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 13, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 24, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 13, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 12, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 21, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 28, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance