Drawing for CERTIKIN

USPTO serial 75196292

CERTIKIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERTIKIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN V MORIARTY

JOHN V MORIARTY BANK ONE CTR TWRWOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY ET AL111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006swimming pools, metal fittings for swimming pools, namely, wall inlets, grilles, grates, pipes, manually operated valves, nuts, bolts, washers and gaskets, swimming pool rollers, swimming pool ladders, prefabricated portable buildings to accommodate swimming pools, diving boards, fittings for diving boards, namely, brackets, bolts, hand-rails, screws, nuts, stanchions and clamps and storage tanks for the storage of water and of chemicals, all made of metalACTIVE—
019non-metal swimming pools, non-metal fittings for swimming pools, namely, wall inlets, grilles, grates, drain and recirculation pipes, non-metal swimming pool surrounds, namely, paving stones, ceramic tiles, mosaics not of glass and coping stones for installation on the floor area surrounding the perimeter of pools, swimming pool rollers for flexible pool covers, swimming pool ladders, prefabricated and portable buildings to accommodate swimming pools and fittings for diving boards, namely, hand-rails, stanchions and swimming pool coversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 30, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 12, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 10, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 10, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance