USPTO serial 75196637
THE BUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LELAND P SCHERMER
LELAND P SCHERMER SWEENEY METZ FOX MCGRANN & SCHERMER, LLC11 STANWIX STPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of football performances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |